EmLogic AS
Norwegian team founded in 2021 by four engineers who'd each already built similar companies before
Founded 2021 | Norway | Not published employees
rtos-developmentfirmware-developmentbare-metal-programminghardware-co-design
What is EmLogic AS?
EmLogic AS was founded on January 1, 2021 by Michal Koziel, Snorre Meland, Sven Ivar Mørch, and Espen Tallaksen, each with prior experience founding similar embedded companies, and operates as part of the TechSeed group in Norway. For a hiring buyer, that founder background matters: this is a team led by people who've already built and run comparable firms before, not first-time founders learning the business alongside the client. The firm's stated depth in Zephyr RTOS is a specific, current specialty in the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as a de facto standard.
EmLogic AS works primarily with clients in Industrial, IoT hardware sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS.
EmLogic AS tech stack and services
Zephyr RTOSFPGACC++
| Service area |
|---|
| RTOS Development |
| Firmware Development |
| Bare-Metal Programming |
| Hardware Co-Design |
EmLogic AS pricing
Short answer: EmLogic AS uses a project-based embedded design engagements pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Project-based embedded design | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
EmLogic AS does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
EmLogic AS pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +All four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship | -Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any team on this list |
| +Zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system much of the industry now treats as a de facto standard | -Public team size and detailed case study history are not yet published |
| +FPGA and hardware design capability alongside firmware covers projects needing custom logic as well as MCU code | -No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| +Part of the TechSeed group in Norway, giving access to a broader company-building network |
EmLogic AS vs alternatives
How EmLogic AS compares to the other top Embedded Firmware Development developers.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | Teams needing dedicated engineers with direct chip-vendor backing. | 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| Dojo Five | Teams that want a remote-first firmware partner with... | Stated "modern firmware" culture with explicit values (humble confidence, 40-hour weeks) built into how the team operates day to day | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Barr Group | Teams wanting engineers whose published technical work they... | Led by Michael Barr, a recognized embedded software author and former magazine editor-in-chief, giving prospective clients a public body of work to evaluate first | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Voler Systems | Teams wanting long-tenured senior engineers over a fast-scaled... | 46 years of continuous operation with a small, senior team rather than a fast-scaled workforce | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Beningo Embedded Group | Teams wanting direct access to one named, verifiable... | Founder-led model with direct prior consulting and training engagements at General Motors, Intel, Infineon, and Renesas | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| RMB Consulting | Teams wanting to work directly with one named,... | 30-plus years of hands-on embedded engineering experience concentrated in a single named principal with a public technical record | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Conclusive Engineering | Teams valuing engineers with named prior experience at... | Team includes engineers with prior experience at Cadence Design Systems and iXsystems, backed by Nordic Semiconductor and Texas Instruments partner status | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| A2e Technologies | Teams needing ITAR-cleared engineers for defense and space... | ITAR-certified team with anti-tamper hardware security specialization, a specific clearance and process discipline most teams don't hold | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| ByteSnap Design | Teams wanting continuity under the same founders and... | 17 years under the same two founders, with a team carrying hands-on experience across ZigBee, LoRa, Wi-Fi, BLE, and GSM | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| DE Design Works | Teams needing engineers experienced with rugged industrial, medical,... | 23 years of continuous firmware and hardware work specifically for rugged industrial, medical, and military applications | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| USA Firmware | Small teams wanting senior, multi-discipline engineers without separate... | 150-plus combined years of leadership experience concentrated in a 17-person team, an unusually high seniority ratio | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| NOVO Engineering | Teams wanting engineers with an unusually high average... | Engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Droid Technologies | Teams needing engineers whose primary specialty is embedded... | Grew from 4 to 80+ engineers in 9 years with embedded GUI as the team's lead hiring specialty across LVGL, TouchGFX, Qt, and Embedded Wizard | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Ignitec | Teams building wearable products needing engineers who specialize... | Wearable technology as a stated primary specialty, not a general IoT capability applied to a wearable project after the fact | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Oxalis Design | Very small teams wanting direct, ongoing access to... | Founder-led team where both founders remain personally involved in client engineering work, not just management | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Lobaro GmbH | Teams needing deep LoRaWAN and low-power wide-area network... | LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| NeuronicWorks | Teams wanting the same engineers to carry a... | In-house manufacturing capability, including box build and PCB assembly, means the firmware team stays involved through physical production | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| ARCH-Embedded | Teams needing engineers with direct prior positioning-technology experience. | Team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Zone7 Engineering | Teams wanting direct, single-point engineering accountability on a... | Founder personally performs project planning, circuit design, and firmware development, with no layers between quoting and delivery | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Ripcord Designs | Teams wanting senior technical judgment applied directly rather... | Founded by a former Engineering Director who moved from managing engineering to doing it directly, spanning MedTech, IVD, and industrial products | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Blue Sparq | Teams building products with physical control systems and... | Control system design and manufacturing specialization, a narrower and more specific skill set than general embedded firmware alone | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| CMD MedTech | Small teams needing close, senior-level medical device engineering... | Woman-owned small business built specifically around medical device systems, software, and regulatory support | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Promenade Software | Teams wanting a stated faster development methodology within... | Founders set out to apply web-framework development speed to FDA-relevant safety-critical medical device firmware, a stated methodology difference | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Embien Technologies | Teams wanting continuity from concept through manufacturing without... | One-stop lifecycle scope means the same team a client hires stays engaged from ideation through manufacturing handoff | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Klika Tech | Teams needing distributed, multi-timezone staffing from one vendor... | Delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia with AWS IoT and STMicroelectronics partner status backing distributed team staffing | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| WebbyLab | Teams needing full-cycle staffing from hardware selection through... | Grew from a small graduate-student founding team to 120+ engineers over 14 years, with Fortune 500 client relationships along the way | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Waferlabs Embedded Technology | Very small engagements wanting engineers with major semiconductor-company... | Founding team with prior experience at Intel, Broadcom, and Qualcomm running a small, direct embedded design practice | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| EES | Teams deliberately avoiding a large delivery organization in... | Explicitly positions itself as senior-led, keeping the team small by design rather than as a growth-stage limitation | 3.8 | Full comparison |
EmLogic AS FAQ
What is EmLogic AS?
Norwegian team founded in 2021 by four engineers who'd each already built similar companies before
How much does EmLogic AS charge?
EmLogic AS uses project-based embedded design engagements pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does EmLogic AS use?
EmLogic AS works with Zephyr RTOS, FPGA, C, C++. Primary industries served include Industrial, IoT hardware.
Is EmLogic AS right for enterprise?
Teams wanting Zephyr RTOS specialists led by repeat embedded-company founders. Not published team size. Key consideration: Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any team on this list.
What are the best EmLogic AS alternatives?
The best alternatives to EmLogic AS depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: 200+ engineers across four countries with direct nxp, stmicroelectronics, and microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab
- Dojo Five: stated "modern firmware" culture with explicit values (humble confidence, 40-hour weeks) built into how the team operates day to day
- Barr Group: led by michael barr, a recognized embedded software author and former magazine editor-in-chief, giving prospective clients a public body of work to evaluate first
Compare EmLogic AS with other Embedded Firmware Development developers
EmLogic AS vs Lemberg Solutions EmLogic AS vs Dojo Five EmLogic AS vs Barr Group EmLogic AS vs Voler Systems EmLogic AS vs Beningo Embedded Group EmLogic AS vs RMB Consulting EmLogic AS vs Conclusive Engineering EmLogic AS vs A2e Technologies EmLogic AS vs ByteSnap Design EmLogic AS vs DE Design Works EmLogic AS vs USA Firmware EmLogic AS vs NOVO Engineering EmLogic AS vs Droid Technologies EmLogic AS vs Ignitec EmLogic AS vs Oxalis Design EmLogic AS vs Lobaro GmbH EmLogic AS vs NeuronicWorks EmLogic AS vs ARCH-Embedded EmLogic AS vs Zone7 Engineering EmLogic AS vs Ripcord Designs EmLogic AS vs Blue Sparq EmLogic AS vs CMD MedTech EmLogic AS vs Promenade Software EmLogic AS vs Embien Technologies EmLogic AS vs Klika Tech EmLogic AS vs WebbyLab EmLogic AS vs Waferlabs Embedded Technology EmLogic AS vs EES
Verify all details directly with EmLogic AS before making a decision.