Conclusive Engineering

Katowice team of 30 to 50 with engineers who previously worked at Cadence and iXsystems

Founded 2018 | Katowice, Poland | 30–50 employees

4.3 / 5

firmware-developmentrtos-developmentbare-metal-programminghardware-co-designembedded-linuxfunctional-safety

Overview Tech stack Pricing Pros & cons Alternatives FAQ

What is Conclusive Engineering?

Conclusive Engineering was founded in 2018 in Katowice, Poland by Jakub Klama and Wojciech Kloska, with a team most sources place between 30 and 50 engineers, several of whom carry prior experience at Cadence Design Systems, iXsystems, and Silicon Valley startups. That prior-employer detail matters to a hiring-focused buyer the same way it would in a direct hiring decision: it's evidence of where the team's actual technical judgment was formed, not just a generic claim of expertise. Nordic Semiconductor and Texas Instruments partner status backs the team's chip-selection work with vendor-level support.

Conclusive Engineering works primarily with clients in Automotive, Healthcare, Industrial, Manufacturing sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Team includes engineers with prior experience at Cadence Design Systems and iXsystems, backed by Nordic Semiconductor and Texas Instruments partner status.

Conclusive Engineering tech stack and services

FreeRTOSEmbedded LinuxFreeBSDNordic nRFCC++FPGA

Service area
Firmware Development
RTOS Development
Bare-Metal Programming
Hardware Co-Design
Embedded Linux
Functional Safety

Conclusive Engineering pricing

Short answer: Conclusive Engineering uses a design-phase consulting, project-based engineering engagements pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.

Engagement model	Typical range	Best for
Design-phase consulting	Variable; depends on team size	Large programmes or team augmentation
Project-based engineering	Variable; depends on team size	Large programmes or team augmentation

Conclusive Engineering does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.

Conclusive Engineering pros and cons

Advantages	Things to consider
+Engineers with prior experience at Cadence Design Systems and iXsystems give a hiring buyer a concrete, checkable background to evaluate	-Team size estimates vary between roughly 30 and 50 engineers depending on source
+Nordic Semiconductor and Texas Instruments partner status backs the team's own chip-selection judgment with vendor-level support	-7 years of operating history is shorter than several other boutique teams on this list
+FreeBSD depth is uncommon among competing teams, most of whom default to Linux or bare-metal only	-No published pricing or minimum engagement threshold
+7 years of operating history under its two named co-founders

Conclusive Engineering vs alternatives

How Conclusive Engineering compares to the other top Embedded Firmware Development developers.

Company	Best for	Key difference	Rating	Compare
Lemberg Solutions	Teams needing dedicated engineers with direct chip-vendor backing.	200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab	4.8	Full comparison
Dojo Five	Teams that want a remote-first firmware partner with...	Stated "modern firmware" culture with explicit values (humble confidence, 40-hour weeks) built into how the team operates day to day	4.5	Full comparison
Barr Group	Teams wanting engineers whose published technical work they...	Led by Michael Barr, a recognized embedded software author and former magazine editor-in-chief, giving prospective clients a public body of work to evaluate first	4.5	Full comparison
Voler Systems	Teams wanting long-tenured senior engineers over a fast-scaled...	46 years of continuous operation with a small, senior team rather than a fast-scaled workforce	4.5	Full comparison
Beningo Embedded Group	Teams wanting direct access to one named, verifiable...	Founder-led model with direct prior consulting and training engagements at General Motors, Intel, Infineon, and Renesas	4.4	Full comparison
RMB Consulting	Teams wanting to work directly with one named,...	30-plus years of hands-on embedded engineering experience concentrated in a single named principal with a public technical record	4.3	Full comparison
A2e Technologies	Teams needing ITAR-cleared engineers for defense and space...	ITAR-certified team with anti-tamper hardware security specialization, a specific clearance and process discipline most teams don't hold	4.3	Full comparison
ByteSnap Design	Teams wanting continuity under the same founders and...	17 years under the same two founders, with a team carrying hands-on experience across ZigBee, LoRa, Wi-Fi, BLE, and GSM	4.2	Full comparison
DE Design Works	Teams needing engineers experienced with rugged industrial, medical,...	23 years of continuous firmware and hardware work specifically for rugged industrial, medical, and military applications	4.2	Full comparison
USA Firmware	Small teams wanting senior, multi-discipline engineers without separate...	150-plus combined years of leadership experience concentrated in a 17-person team, an unusually high seniority ratio	4.0	Full comparison
NOVO Engineering	Teams wanting engineers with an unusually high average...	Engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim	4.1	Full comparison
Droid Technologies	Teams needing engineers whose primary specialty is embedded...	Grew from 4 to 80+ engineers in 9 years with embedded GUI as the team's lead hiring specialty across LVGL, TouchGFX, Qt, and Embedded Wizard	4.1	Full comparison
Ignitec	Teams building wearable products needing engineers who specialize...	Wearable technology as a stated primary specialty, not a general IoT capability applied to a wearable project after the fact	4.0	Full comparison
Oxalis Design	Very small teams wanting direct, ongoing access to...	Founder-led team where both founders remain personally involved in client engineering work, not just management	4.0	Full comparison
Lobaro GmbH	Teams needing deep LoRaWAN and low-power wide-area network...	LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth	3.8	Full comparison
NeuronicWorks	Teams wanting the same engineers to carry a...	In-house manufacturing capability, including box build and PCB assembly, means the firmware team stays involved through physical production	3.9	Full comparison
EmLogic AS	Teams wanting Zephyr RTOS specialists led by repeat...	Founding team with prior experience each building similar embedded companies, concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS	3.8	Full comparison
ARCH-Embedded	Teams needing engineers with direct prior positioning-technology experience.	Team includes engineers with prior experience at TomTom and in micro-mobility products, a specific and checkable positioning-technology background	3.8	Full comparison
Zone7 Engineering	Teams wanting direct, single-point engineering accountability on a...	Founder personally performs project planning, circuit design, and firmware development, with no layers between quoting and delivery	3.9	Full comparison
Ripcord Designs	Teams wanting senior technical judgment applied directly rather...	Founded by a former Engineering Director who moved from managing engineering to doing it directly, spanning MedTech, IVD, and industrial products	3.8	Full comparison
Blue Sparq	Teams building products with physical control systems and...	Control system design and manufacturing specialization, a narrower and more specific skill set than general embedded firmware alone	3.9	Full comparison
CMD MedTech	Small teams needing close, senior-level medical device engineering...	Woman-owned small business built specifically around medical device systems, software, and regulatory support	4.0	Full comparison
Promenade Software	Teams wanting a stated faster development methodology within...	Founders set out to apply web-framework development speed to FDA-relevant safety-critical medical device firmware, a stated methodology difference	4.0	Full comparison
Embien Technologies	Teams wanting continuity from concept through manufacturing without...	One-stop lifecycle scope means the same team a client hires stays engaged from ideation through manufacturing handoff	4.0	Full comparison
Klika Tech	Teams needing distributed, multi-timezone staffing from one vendor...	Delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia with AWS IoT and STMicroelectronics partner status backing distributed team staffing	3.8	Full comparison
WebbyLab	Teams needing full-cycle staffing from hardware selection through...	Grew from a small graduate-student founding team to 120+ engineers over 14 years, with Fortune 500 client relationships along the way	3.8	Full comparison
Waferlabs Embedded Technology	Very small engagements wanting engineers with major semiconductor-company...	Founding team with prior experience at Intel, Broadcom, and Qualcomm running a small, direct embedded design practice	3.6	Full comparison
EES	Teams deliberately avoiding a large delivery organization in...	Explicitly positions itself as senior-led, keeping the team small by design rather than as a growth-stage limitation	3.8	Full comparison

See all Conclusive Engineering alternatives

Conclusive Engineering FAQ

What is Conclusive Engineering?

Katowice team of 30 to 50 with engineers who previously worked at Cadence and iXsystems

How much does Conclusive Engineering charge?

Conclusive Engineering uses design-phase consulting, project-based engineering engagements pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.

What tech stack does Conclusive Engineering use?

Conclusive Engineering works with FreeRTOS, Embedded Linux, FreeBSD, Nordic nRF, C, C++, FPGA. Primary industries served include Automotive, Healthcare, Industrial, Manufacturing.

Is Conclusive Engineering right for enterprise?

Teams valuing engineers with named prior experience at recognized companies. 30–50 team size. Key consideration: Team size estimates vary between roughly 30 and 50 engineers depending on source.

What are the best Conclusive Engineering alternatives?

The best alternatives to Conclusive Engineering depend on your use case. Top options are:

Lemberg Solutions: 200+ engineers across four countries with direct nxp, stmicroelectronics, and microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab
Dojo Five: stated "modern firmware" culture with explicit values (humble confidence, 40-hour weeks) built into how the team operates day to day
Barr Group: led by michael barr, a recognized embedded software author and former magazine editor-in-chief, giving prospective clients a public body of work to evaluate first

See full alternatives list

Compare Conclusive Engineering with other Embedded Firmware Development developers

Verify all details directly with Conclusive Engineering before making a decision.