NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
NOVO Engineering (4.1/5) edges ahead of Klika Tech (3.8/5) overall. NOVO Engineering is the better choice for teams wanting engineers with an unusually high average tenure across disciplines. Klika Tech is the stronger option for teams needing distributed, multi-timezone staffing from one vendor relationship. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2013 |
| HQ | Vista, CA, USA | North Miami Beach, FL, USA |
| Team size | 48–60 | Not published |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim | Delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia with AWS IoT and STMicroelectronics partner status backing distributed team staffing |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope product engineering engagements | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Embedded Systems Programming | AWS IoT, C, C++ |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology, Commercial products | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices |
NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech: overview
NOVO Engineering
NOVO Engineering was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Vista, California near San Diego, with a second location near Minneapolis and a team reported between 48 and 60 engineers averaging 16 years of experience each. That average-tenure figure is a specific, checkable claim a hiring buyer can weigh directly: it means the typical engineer assigned to a project has already spent over a decade and a half solving comparable problems. Systems engineering scope means firmware roles work alongside mechanical and electrical engineers on the same team, not in a separate silo.
Klika Tech
Klika Tech was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in North Miami Beach, Florida, with delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia including a Wrocław, Poland office opened in 2021. That multi-continent footprint means a hiring buyer can staff a distributed team across timezones from a single vendor relationship, backed by AWS IoT and DevOps competency status and STMicroelectronics partner status on the hardware side. For a client whose product needs firmware, hardware, and an AWS-based backend engineered together, this team's structure is built around that combination.
Services and capabilities: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Capability | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety | ✗ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Framework / platform | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| LVGL | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Criterion | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed-scope product engineering, Pre-production manufacturing support | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engineering |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Dimension | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices |
| Best use cases | Hiring a multi-discipline team spanning mechanical, electrical, and firmware, Biotech instrumentation development needing senior, cross-discipline engineers | Staffing a distributed, multi-timezone embedded team from one vendor, Hiring engineers experienced with AWS IoT-integrated hardware programs |
| Typical project type | Fixed-scope product engineering | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engineering |
NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech: pros and cons
| NOVO Engineering | |
|---|---|
| + | Engineering team averages 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific, checkable seniority claim |
| + | Systems engineering scope puts firmware engineers on the same team as mechanical and electrical staff, not a separate silo |
| + | Two US locations near San Diego and Minneapolis give onsite coverage options |
| + | 21 years of operating history in medical device and biotech instrumentation work |
| - | 48 to 60 engineers caps how many large concurrent programs the team can staff at once |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| - | Firmware is one discipline inside a broader systems-engineering team, not a standalone firmware-only group |
| Klika Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | Delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia support distributed, multi-timezone team hiring |
| + | AWS IoT and DevOps competency status is a verifiable AWS partner credential |
| + | STMicroelectronics partner status pairs cloud integration expertise with direct chip-vendor support |
| + | 12 years of operating history with continuous multi-region expansion |
| - | AWS-centric positioning is a narrower fit for hiring needs requiring cloud-agnostic or Azure/GCP-specific expertise |
| - | Public team size figures are not published, making bench-depth verification harder ahead of a large hire |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose NOVO Engineering?
A typical fit: hiring a multi-discipline team spanning mechanical, electrical, and firmware.
Engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology, Commercial products.
Who should choose Klika Tech?
A typical fit: staffing a distributed, multi-timezone embedded team from one vendor.
Delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia with AWS IoT and STMicroelectronics partner status backing distributed team staffing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices.
Decision matrix: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | NOVO Engineering |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: NOVO Engineering (Not published) vs Klika Tech (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | NOVO Engineering |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Use case | NOVO Engineering fit | Klika Tech fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiring a multi-discipline team spanning mechanical, electrical, and firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Biotech instrumentation development needing senior, cross-discipline engineers | Strong | Limited | NOVO Engineering |
| Staffing a distributed, multi-timezone embedded team from one vendor | Limited | Strong | Klika Tech |
| Hiring engineers experienced with AWS IoT-integrated hardware programs | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | Klika Tech |
Verdict: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
NOVO Engineering (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. Engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim.
Klika Tech (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need hiring engineers experienced with AWS IoT-integrated hardware programs. If your situation matches that, Klika Tech is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech FAQ
Is NOVO Engineering better than Klika Tech?
NOVO Engineering (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. NOVO Engineering's strongest advantage: engineering team averages 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific, checkable seniority claim. Klika Tech's strongest advantage: delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia support distributed, multi-timezone team hiring.
How do NOVO Engineering and Klika Tech differ in pricing?
NOVO Engineering uses fixed-scope product engineering engagements pricing. Klika Tech uses project-based iot and cloud-embedded engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: NOVO Engineering or Klika Tech?
NOVO Engineering is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between NOVO Engineering and Klika Tech?
NOVO Engineering's primary differentiator is: engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer, a specific and checkable seniority claim. Klika Tech's primary differentiator is: delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia with AWS IoT and STMicroelectronics partner status backing distributed team staffing. They also differ in team size (48–60 vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Biotech vs Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.