Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lobaro GmbH (3.8/5) edges ahead of WebbyLab (3.8/5) overall. Lobaro GmbH is the better choice for teams needing deep LoRaWAN and low-power wide-area network specialists. WebbyLab is the stronger option for teams needing full-cycle staffing from hardware selection through the connected application layer. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lobaro GmbH | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
| HQ | Hamburg, Germany | Kyiv, Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 15 | 120+ |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth | Grew from a small graduate-student founding team to 120+ engineers over 14 years, with Fortune 500 client relationships along the way |
| Pricing model | Project-based IoT firmware and platform engagements | Project-based full-cycle IoT engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | LoRa, LoRaWAN, Sigfox | C, C++, IoT Connectivity Protocols |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Utility metering, Environmental monitoring | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce |
Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab: overview
Lobaro GmbH
Lobaro GmbH was founded in Hamburg in 2012 by Tobias Rohde and has grown to around 15 people, a design partner of Nordic Semiconductor and a member of the LoRa Alliance. That small, focused size means a hiring buyer working with Lobaro is working with a meaningful fraction of the entire firm's engineering capacity on any given engagement, not a rotating slice of a much larger organization. The team's protocol depth spans LoRa, LoRaWAN, Sigfox, LTE, and wireless M-Bus, a specific low-power wide-area networking specialty built over 13 years.
WebbyLab
WebbyLab was founded in 2011 by Anton Morozov and Viktor Turskyi, who started the company as graduate students with a handful of people and limited resources, and now operates from Kyiv and London with more than 120 engineers across hardware, firmware, and software disciplines. That growth story, from a small founding team to a 120-plus person organization over 14 years, matters to a hiring buyer weighing whether a team can scale with a growing program while Fortune 500 client relationships indicate the team has already handled large-organization hiring processes.
Services and capabilities: Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab
| Capability | Lobaro GmbH | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Functional safety | ✗ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab
| Framework / platform | Lobaro GmbH | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | N/A | ✓ |
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| LVGL | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab
| Criterion | Lobaro GmbH | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based IoT firmware and platform development | Project-based full-cycle development |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab
| Dimension | Lobaro GmbH | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Utility metering, Environmental monitoring | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Hiring a specialized LoRaWAN team for an industrial monitoring deployment, Wireless M-Bus firmware development for a utility metering product | Hiring a full-cycle team spanning hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app, Staffing an embedded firmware program requiring cloud integration |
| Typical project type | Project-based IoT firmware and platform development | Project-based full-cycle development |
Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab: pros and cons
| Lobaro GmbH | |
|---|---|
| + | LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status verify its low-power wide-area networking credentials |
| + | A team of around 15 means a client's engagement represents a substantial share of the firm's total capacity, not a thin slice |
| + | 13 years of operating history with a consistent focus on industrial IoT sensor and gateway firmware |
| + | Received public innovation funding through IFB Hamburg's InnoRampUp programme, an independently verifiable signal of institutional confidence |
| - | A team of around 15 people is small relative to industrial IoT programs requiring firmware across many product lines at once |
| - | LPWAN protocol focus is a narrower fit for firmware projects centered on Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or cellular broadband instead |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| WebbyLab | |
|---|---|
| + | Growth from a small graduate-student founding team to 120+ engineers over 14 years demonstrates an ability to scale hiring while retaining quality |
| + | Full-cycle scope from hardware selection through the connected application layer reduces the vendor count a client needs to coordinate |
| + | Fortune 500 client relationships indicate prior experience with large-organization hiring and procurement processes |
| + | 14 years of operating history under its original two founders |
| - | IoT and embedded is one specialty alongside fintech and e-commerce work, not the firm's sole focus |
| - | Specific named case studies with verifiable project details are limited in public materials |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement threshold |
Who should choose Lobaro GmbH?
A typical fit: hiring a specialized LoRaWAN team for an industrial monitoring deployment.
LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Utility metering, Environmental monitoring.
Who should choose WebbyLab?
A typical fit: hiring a full-cycle team spanning hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app.
Grew from a small graduate-student founding team to 120+ engineers over 14 years, with Fortune 500 client relationships along the way. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce.
Decision matrix: Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lobaro GmbH (Not published) vs WebbyLab (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lobaro GmbH |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab
| Use case | Lobaro GmbH fit | WebbyLab fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiring a specialized LoRaWAN team for an industrial monitoring deployment | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Wireless M-Bus firmware development for a utility metering product | Strong | Limited | Lobaro GmbH |
| Hiring a full-cycle team spanning hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Staffing an embedded firmware program requiring cloud integration | Limited | Strong | WebbyLab |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | WebbyLab |
Verdict: Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab
Lobaro GmbH (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth.
WebbyLab (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need staffing an embedded firmware program requiring cloud integration. If your situation matches that, WebbyLab is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lobaro GmbH vs WebbyLab FAQ
Is Lobaro GmbH better than WebbyLab?
Lobaro GmbH (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lobaro GmbH's strongest advantage: LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status verify its low-power wide-area networking credentials. WebbyLab's strongest advantage: growth from a small graduate-student founding team to 120+ engineers over 14 years demonstrates an ability to scale hiring while retaining quality.
How do Lobaro GmbH and WebbyLab differ in pricing?
Lobaro GmbH uses project-based iot firmware and platform engagements pricing. WebbyLab uses project-based full-cycle iot engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lobaro GmbH or WebbyLab?
WebbyLab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lobaro GmbH and WebbyLab?
Lobaro GmbH's primary differentiator is: LoRa Alliance membership and Nordic Semiconductor design partner status with a 15-person team built around LPWAN protocol depth. WebbyLab's primary differentiator is: grew from a small graduate-student founding team to 120+ engineers over 14 years, with Fortune 500 client relationships along the way. They also differ in team size (15 vs 120+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Utility metering vs IoT hardware products, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.