Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of CMD MedTech (4.0/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams needing dedicated engineers with direct chip-vendor backing. CMD MedTech is the stronger option for small teams needing close, senior-level medical device engineering with supplier-diversity credentials. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | CMD MedTech |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2016 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Columbus, OH, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 13 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab | Woman-owned small business built specifically around medical device systems, software, and regulatory support |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based medical device engineering engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | C, C++, Medical Device Software Standards |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Medical devices |
Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 in Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. For a buyer evaluating who they'd actually work with, the firm's scale means dedicated engineers rather than shared generalist staff, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip and an in-house hardware lab the team uses daily for board bring-up. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline a hiring manager can expect from the assigned team, not just a company-wide policy on paper.
CMD MedTech
CMD MedTech was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, with roughly 13 employees as of mid-2025. The firm specializes entirely in medical device development, covering systems engineering, software and firmware, and regulatory and quality support. Its status as a woman-owned small business can matter to a hiring buyer with supplier-diversity requirements, and the small team structure means a client works directly with the senior engineers doing the work rather than being routed through a larger delivery organization.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | CMD MedTech |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✓ |
| Functional safety | ✓ | ✓ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | CMD MedTech |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| LVGL | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | CMD MedTech |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based engineering with regulatory support |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | CMD MedTech |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics | Medical devices |
| Best use cases | Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers, Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment | Hiring a small, senior medical device engineering team with regulatory expertise, Systems and firmware engineering for a medical device FDA submission |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based engineering with regulatory support |
Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients |
| + | In-house hardware lab means the assigned team validates board bring-up itself rather than waiting on a separate department |
| + | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status is a credential the actual engineers on a project can draw on directly |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline built into daily team workflow, not just policy documents |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so a manufacturing handoff still needs a separate team |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification filings on the client's behalf |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so team-size and cost fit needs a direct scoping conversation |
| CMD MedTech | |
|---|---|
| + | Medical device development is the firm's sole focus, not one vertical among several |
| + | Woman-owned small business status can satisfy supplier-diversity requirements in enterprise and government hiring |
| + | Regulatory and quality support is built into the delivery process rather than treated as a separate service |
| + | Small team size gives direct access to senior engineers rather than being routed through account layers |
| - | 13 employees is one of the smallest teams on this list, which caps how many concurrent programs the firm can run |
| - | 9 years of operating history is shorter than several competitors with 20-plus years in medical device work |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers.
200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose CMD MedTech?
A typical fit: hiring a small, senior medical device engineering team with regulatory expertise.
Woman-owned small business built specifically around medical device systems, software, and regulatory support. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs CMD MedTech (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | CMD MedTech |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | CMD MedTech fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Hiring a small, senior medical device engineering team with regulatory expertise | Limited | Strong | CMD MedTech |
| Systems and firmware engineering for a medical device FDA submission | Limited | Strong | CMD MedTech |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab.
CMD MedTech (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need systems and firmware engineering for a medical device FDA submission. If your situation matches that, CMD MedTech is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs CMD MedTech FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than CMD MedTech?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients. CMD MedTech's strongest advantage: medical device development is the firm's sole focus, not one vertical among several.
How do Lemberg Solutions and CMD MedTech differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. CMD MedTech uses project-based medical device engineering engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or CMD MedTech?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and CMD MedTech?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. CMD MedTech's primary differentiator is: woman-owned small business built specifically around medical device systems, software, and regulatory support. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 13), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy vs Medical devices).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.