Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of ByteSnap Design (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for teams needing dedicated engineers with direct chip-vendor backing. ByteSnap Design is the stronger option for teams wanting continuity under the same founders and broad wireless protocol experience. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2008 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Birmingham, UK |
| Team size | 200+ | 37 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab | 17 years under the same two founders, with a team carrying hands-on experience across ZigBee, LoRa, Wi-Fi, BLE, and GSM |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based embedded and electronics engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | C, C++, Embedded Linux |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT, Telecommunications |
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 in Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. For a buyer evaluating who they'd actually work with, the firm's scale means dedicated engineers rather than shared generalist staff, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip and an in-house hardware lab the team uses daily for board bring-up. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline a hiring manager can expect from the assigned team, not just a company-wide policy on paper.
ByteSnap Design
ByteSnap Design was founded in 2008 by Dunstan Power and Graeme Wintle and operates from Birmingham, UK with roughly 37 employees, with stated plans to grow toward 50. Both founders remain active and visible in the company's public materials, which matters to a hiring buyer evaluating leadership continuity: this is a team that has grown under the same two people for 17 years, not one that's changed ownership or leadership direction along the way. The team's wireless protocol breadth (ZigBee, LoRa, Wi-Fi, BLE, GSM) means engineers on staff have hands-on experience across a wider set of connectivity standards than most similarly sized teams.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Functional safety | ✓ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| LVGL | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based embedded engineering |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics | Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT, Telecommunications |
| Best use cases | Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers, Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment | Hiring a team with broad wireless protocol experience for a new connected device, Combined electronics and firmware engineering under founders still actively involved |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based embedded engineering |
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients |
| + | In-house hardware lab means the assigned team validates board bring-up itself rather than waiting on a separate department |
| + | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status is a credential the actual engineers on a project can draw on directly |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications reflect process discipline built into daily team workflow, not just policy documents |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so a manufacturing handoff still needs a separate team |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification filings on the client's behalf |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so team-size and cost fit needs a direct scoping conversation |
| ByteSnap Design | |
|---|---|
| + | 17 years under the same two founders gives a hiring buyer confidence in leadership continuity |
| + | Wireless protocol breadth across five distinct standards means engineers have real hands-on range, not a single-protocol specialty |
| + | In-house electronics design keeps hardware and firmware roles on the same team |
| + | Embedded Linux and Android porting experience covers higher-complexity connected products |
| - | 37 employees, growing toward 50, is smaller than teams needed for the largest concurrent programs |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement threshold |
| - | Some wireless protocol claims are per company website and independently unverifiable beyond that source |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers.
200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy, Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose ByteSnap Design?
A typical fit: hiring a team with broad wireless protocol experience for a new connected device.
17 years under the same two founders, with a team carrying hands-on experience across ZigBee, LoRa, Wi-Fi, BLE, and GSM. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT, Telecommunications.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs ByteSnap Design (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | ByteSnap Design fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extending an in-house team with dedicated RTOS and bare-metal engineers | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Hardware validation and board bring-up needing a team with its own lab equipment | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Hiring a team with broad wireless protocol experience for a new connected device | Limited | Strong | ByteSnap Design |
| Combined electronics and firmware engineering under founders still actively involved | Limited | Strong | ByteSnap Design |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware Development projects. 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab.
ByteSnap Design (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need combined electronics and firmware engineering under founders still actively involved. If your situation matches that, ByteSnap Design is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than ByteSnap Design?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 200+ engineers give a hiring team dedicated staff rather than shared generalists spread thin across many clients. ByteSnap Design's strongest advantage: 17 years under the same two founders gives a hiring buyer confidence in leadership continuity.
How do Lemberg Solutions and ByteSnap Design differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. ByteSnap Design uses project-based embedded and electronics engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or ByteSnap Design?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each developer before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and ByteSnap Design?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 200+ engineers across four countries with direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status and an in-house hardware lab. ByteSnap Design's primary differentiator is: 17 years under the same two founders, with a team carrying hands-on experience across ZigBee, LoRa, Wi-Fi, BLE, and GSM. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 37), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy vs Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each developer before making a decision.